Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:48
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
SpaceX fires up Super Heavy booster ahead of Starship's 10th test flight (video) - Space
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What does it mean when a British person says "I can't be asked"?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The man who refused to die, and came back from his death 6 times - Times of India
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Woman attacked by rabid cat in Lynchburg, health officials say - WSET
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Musk Denies Ketamine Use Following New York Times Report - Bloomberg.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
European leaders worry they’re too reliant on U.S. tech - TechCrunch
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?